Article Text
Abstract
A company called Biojewellery has proposed to take a sample of bone tissue from a couple and to grow this sample into wedding rings. One of the ethical problems that such a proposal faces is that it implies surgery without medical need. To this end, only couples with a prior need for surgery are being considered. This paper examines the question of whether such a stipulation is necessary. It is suggested that, though medical need and the provision of health and wellbeing is overwhelmingly the warrant for surgical intervention, there is no reason in principle why other, non-medical, projects such as jewellery creation might not also warrant surgical intervention. Implicitly, this line of thought forces us to consider the proper place of surgical intervention—that is, to ask what surgeons are for.
- surgery
- jewellery
- harm
- warrant
- project
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Efficacy of continuous intravenous remimazolam versus midazolam in the extraction of impacted wisdom teeth: protocol of a randomised controlled trial
- Unmet needs for cataract surgery in Spain according to indication criteria. Evaluation through a simulation model
- Minerva
- Septic arthritis of the temporomandibular joint leading to an epidural abscess
- NICE issues guidelines on wisdom teeth
- What place is there for tramadol/dexketoprofen?
- Impact of the increasing use of immunosuppressants in Crohn’s disease on the need for intestinal surgery
- Bio-bling: making jewellery from human tissue
- The panoramic dental radiograph for emergency physicians
- Placement of a customised load-bearing titanium plate for prevention of iatrogenic mandibular fracture in surgical removal of odontogenic keratocyst recurrence