Article Text
Abstract
Objectives: To analyse legislation and medical professional positions concerning the doctor’s role in assisted dying in western Europe, and to discuss their implications for doctors.
Method: This paper is based on country-specific reports by experts from European countries where assisted dying is legalised (Belgium, The Netherlands), or openly practiced (Switzerland), or where it is illegal (Germany, Norway, UK).
Results: Laws on assisted dying in The Netherlands and Belgium are restricted to doctors. In principle, assisted suicide (but not euthanasia) is not illegal in either Germany or Switzerland, but a doctor’s participation in Germany would violate the code of professional medical conduct and might contravene of a doctor’s legal duty to save life. The Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill proposed in the UK in 2005 focused on doctors, whereas the Proposal on Assisted Dying of the Norwegian Penal Code Commission minority in 2002 did not.
Professional medical organisations in all these countries except The Netherlands maintain the position that medical assistance in dying conflicts with the basic role of doctors. However, in Belgium and Switzerland, and for a time in the UK, these organisations dropped their opposition to new legislation. Today, they regard the issue as primarily a matter for society and politics. This “neutral” stance differs from the official position of the Royal Dutch Medical Association which has played a key role in developing the Dutch practice of euthanasia as a “medical end-of-life decision” since the 1970s.
Conclusion: A society moving towards an open approach to assisted dying should carefully identify tasks to assign exclusively to medical doctors, and distinguish those possibly better performed by other professions.
- end of life
- euthanasia
- assisted suicide
- professional role
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Supplementary materials
web only appendix 34/1/28
Files in this Data Supplement:
Footnotes
Additional data are published online only at http://jme.bmj.com/vol34/issue1
Competing interests: None.
Other content recommended for you
- Assisted suicide and euthanasia in Switzerland: allowing a role for non-physicians
- Canadian French and English newspapers’ portrayals of physicians’ role and medical assistance in dying (MAiD) from 1972 to 2016: a qualitative textual analysis
- ‘How is it possible that at times we can be physicians and at times assistants in suicide?’ Attitudes and experiences of palliative care physicians in respect of the current legal situation of suicide assistance in Switzerland
- Responses to assisted suicide requests: an interview study with Swiss palliative care physicians
- Impact of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) on family caregivers
- The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review
- Words matter: ‘enduring intolerable suffering’ and the provider-side peril of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada
- Procedural safeguards cannot disentangle MAiD from organ donation decisions
- Euthanasia and other end of life decisions and care provided in final three months of life: nationwide retrospective study in Belgium
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context