Article Text
Abstract
Placebos are arguably the most commonly prescribed drug, across cultures and throughout history. Nevertheless, today many would consider their use in the clinic unethical, since placebo treatment involves deception and the violation of patients’ autonomy. We examine the placebo's definition and its clinical efficacy from a biopsychosocial perspective, and argue that the intentional use of the placebo and placebo effect, in certain circumstances and under several conditions, may be morally acceptable. We highlight the role of a virtue-based ethical orientation and its implications for the beneficent use of the placebo. In addition, the definitions of lying and deception are discussed, clarified and applied to the clinical placebo dilemma. Lastly, we suggest that concerns about patient autonomy, when invoked as a further argument against administering placebos, are extended beyond their reasonable and coherent application.
- Clinical Ethics
- Informed Consent
- Autonomy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Other content recommended for you
- The ethics of placebo treatments in clinical practice: a reply to Glackin
- Physician perspectives on placebo ethics
- Patient attitudes about the clinical use of placebo: qualitative perspectives from a telephone survey
- Patients’ attitudes about the use of placebo treatments: telephone survey
- Placebo: the lie that comes true?
- Neurofeedback as placebo: a case of unintentional deception?
- Placebo effects and the molecular biological components involved
- Prescribing “placebo treatments”: results of national survey of US internists and rheumatologists
- Placebo effects and racial and ethnic health disparities: an unjust and underexplored connection
- Replication crisis and placebo studies: rebooting the bioethical debate