Article Text
Abstract
Decisions about allocation of limited healthcare resources are frequently controversial. These decisions are usually based on careful analysis of medical, scientific and health economic evidence. Yet, decisions are also necessarily based on value judgements. There may be differing views among health professionals about how to allocate resources or how to evaluate existing evidence. In specific cases, professionals may have strong personal views (contrary to professional or societal norms) that treatment should or should not be provided. Could these disagreements rise to the level of a conscientious objection? If so, should conscientious objections to existing allocation decisions be accommodated? In the first part of this paper, I assess whether resource allocation could be a matter of conscience. I analyse conceptual and normative models of conscientious objection and argue that rationing could be a matter for conscience. I distinguish between negative and positive forms: conscientious non-treatment and conscientious treatment. In the second part of the paper, I identify distinctive challenges for conscientious objections to resource allocation. Such objections are almost always inappropriate.
- Conscientious Objection
- Resource Allocation
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors DW conceived and wrote this paper.
Funding DW was supported for this work by a grant from the Wellcome trust WT106587/Z/14/Z.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Other content recommended for you
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- Is it ethical for a general practitioner to claim a conscientious objection when asked to refer for abortion?
- The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law
- Going above and beneath the call of duty: the luck egalitarian claims of healthcare heroes, and the accomodation of professionally-motivated treatment refusal
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- A critical review of conscientious objection and decriminalisation of abortion in Chile
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: new directions