Article Text
Abstract
There have been multiple factors involved in the decline of the anatomy course’s central role in medical education over the last century. The course has undergone a multitude of changes, in large part due to the rise in technology and cultural shifts away from physical dissection. This paper argues that, as the desire of medical schools to introduce clinical experiences earlier in the curriculum increased, anatomy courses began implementing changes that would align themselves with the shifting culture towards incorporating humanistic values early on in the medical curriculum. One of these changes, argued as a product of this shift, included calling a cadaver a ‘patient’ and introducing the cadaver as a student’s ‘first patient’. This change has been seen in different universities and textbooks. This paper argues that the use of the words ‘patient’ to describe the cadaver in order to promote principled habits in medical students may in fact create an environment that does the opposite. By equating an environment in which the subject of dissection is lifeless and incapable of participation, and the space is discouraging of emotions and conducive to untested coping mechanisms to the clinical environment through using the word ‘patient’, values like detached concern, a controversial practice in medicine, can be implicitly encouraged. An ethical analysis of the use of the word ’patient’ to describe the cadaver shows that this practice can promote unethical habits in students and that changing this aspect of anatomy lab culture could improve ethical dispositions of future physicians.
- education for health care professionals
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors The sole author is responsible for the conception, drafting and final approval of this article.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Collaborators Paul Cummins, PhD.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Other content recommended for you
- Incorporating patient safety into early undergraduate medical education: teaching medical students to perform surgical time outs during anatomy
- ’Knowing everything and yet nothing about her’: medical students’ reflections on their experience of the dissection room
- Anatomy laboratory instruction and occupational exposure to formaldehyde
- What price dissection? Dissection literally dissected
- “Silent virtuous teachers”: anatomical dissection in Taiwan
- Development of a virtual reality clinically oriented temporal bone anatomy module with randomised control study of three-dimensional display technology
- Cadavers as teachers: the dissecting room experience in Thailand
- ‘Developing the medical humanities’–report of a research colloquium, and collected abstracts of papers
- Tablet technology in medical education in South Africa: a mixed methods study
- Modern approaches to teaching and learning anatomy