Article Text
Abstract
This paper introduces the medical factual matrix as a new and potentially valuable tool in medical ethical analysis. Using this tool it demonstrates the idea that a defined medical intervention can only be meaningfully declared futile in relation to a defined goal(s) of treatment. It argues that a declaration of futility made solely in relation to a defined medical intervention is inchoate. It recasts the definition of goal futility as an intervention that cannot alter the probability of the existence of the important outcome states that might flow from a defined intervention. The idea of value futility and the extent of physician obligations in futile situations are also addressed. It also examines the source of substantive conflicts which commonly arise within the doctor-patient relationship and the ensuing power relations that operate between doctor and patient when questions of futility arise.
- DNAR, do not attempt resuscitation
- MFM, medical factual matrix
- NHS, National Health Service
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Evaluating a patient's request for life-prolonging treatment: an ethical framework
- The development of “medical futility”: towards a procedural approach based on the role of the medical profession
- Perceptions of patients on the utility or futility of end-of-life treatment
- Doctors’ perceptions of how resource limitations relate to futility in end-of-life decision making: a qualitative analysis
- Futility has no utility in resuscitation medicine
- The slipperiness of futility
- Applying futility in psychiatry: a concept whose time has come
- Medical futility at the end of life: the perspectives of intensive care and palliative care clinicians
- Australian pharmacists’ perspectives on physician-assisted suicide (PAS): thematic analysis of semistructured interviews
- Sabr and Shukr: doing justice to medical futility