Article Text
Abstract
This paper offers some comments on bioethical debates about resource allocation in healthcare. It is stimulated by Rosalind McDougall’s argument that it is an affront to the human dignity of people with below “liberties-level” health to fund human reproductive cloning. McDougall is right to underline the relevance of resource prioritisation to the ethics of research and provision of new biomedical technologies. This paper argues that bioethicists should be careful when offering comments about such issues. In particular, it emphasises the need to represent accurately the reality of the situation—especially when we are passing judgement on technologies that are in their infancy and whose practical application is yet to be confirmed. The paper also emphasises the importance of the actual context to bioethical debate, and note that it would be better to talk about resource expenditure rather than resource allocation when it comes to discussing the rights and wrongs of how money is spent. It also reiterates the claims made by other writers that social and political philosophy need to have a transparent and considered role in debates about resources.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
- Just another reproductive technology? The ethics of human reproductive cloning as an experimental medical procedure
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- The significance of induced pluripotent stem cells for basic research and clinical therapy
- A resource-based version of the argument that cloning is an affront to human dignity
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans?
- Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud?