Article Text
PDFCommentary
Taxonomy of justifications for consent waivers: When and why are public views relevant?
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors Both authors contributed to developing arguments, research, writing and editing.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Correction notice This article has been corrected since it was published. G. Owen Schaefer was originally listed incorrectly as G. Owen Scaefer
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Public interest in health data research: laying out the conceptual groundwork
- Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research
- Presumed consent in emergency neonatal research
- Turning residual human biological materials into research collections: playing with consent
- Informed consent in cluster randomised trials: a guide for the perplexed
- The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble
- How should we think about clinical data ownership?
- Taking it to the bank: the ethical management of individual findings arising in secondary research
- Seamless EMR data access: Integrated governance, digital health and the OMOP-CDM
- The perils of a broad approach to public interest in health data research: a response to Ballantyne and Schaefer