Article Text
Abstract
Clinical information about patients is increasingly being stored in electronic form and has therefore become more easily shareable. Data are collected as part of clinical care but have multiple other potential uses in relation to health system planning, audit and research. The use of clinical information for these secondary uses is controversial, and the ability to safeguard personal and sensitive data under current practices is contested.
In this study, we investigate the attitudes of a representative sample of the Danish population towards transfer of clinical data from their general practice for secondary use. We specifically study: (1) patients’ trust in different types of healthcare professionals, (2) their interest in being asked about secondary use of data and (3) their willingness to dispense from a requirement of informed consent based on their trust in healthcare professionals.
We find that adult Danes are positive towards research that use patient data, and they generally trust general practitioners, hospitals and researchers to treat their data confidentially.
Nevertheless, they feel that they have a right to control the use of their data, only 7.3% disagreeing, and that the data belong to them, only 14.0% disagreeing. Answers to further questions about the relation between trust, information and consent show that although trust modifies the wish for information and consent, there is still a strong view that the patient should control the use of data. We find no differences between those who have frequent contact with the healthcare system and those who do not.
- demographic surveys/attitudes
- ownership
- public policy
Data availability statement
Data are available upon request.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Multiple modes of data sharing can facilitate secondary use of sensitive health data for research
- Meta consent: a flexible and autonomous way of obtaining informed consent for secondary research
- Patients’ and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence
- How should we think about clinical data ownership?
- Making consent for electronic health and social care data research fit for purpose in the 21st century
- Big health data: the need to earn public trust
- Webinar report: stakeholder perspectives on informed consent for the use of genomic data by commercial entities
- Using routine data to improve palliative and end of life care
- Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research
- Patient data for commercial companies? An ethical framework for sharing patients’ data with for-profit companies for research