Article Text
Abstract
As donor trust legitimises research, trust is vital for research in the fields of biomedicine, genetics, translational medicine and personalised medicine. For parts of the donor community, the consent signature is a sign of trust in research. Many consent processes in biomedical research ask donors to provide their data for an unspecified future use, which introduces uncertainty of the unknown. This uncertainty can jeopardise donor trust or demand blind trust. But which donor wants to trust blindly? To reduce this uncertainty, we explore first, which future-proof actors donors could trust when signing a consent form. Second, we discuss the question Can we know if donor trust expires? and what prevents donor trust from expiring. Finally, we present possible measures that can help to nurture trust in the far future. In this article, we draw on our previous research on trust in biomedical research, on trust in the broader healthcare system and Niklas Luhmann’s and Anthony Giddens’ trust theories. Our findings suggest that, in the far future, researchers will need to consider donor autonomy, as well as societal norms and values of the time period in which the data were donated. They will need to find mechanisms where possible to publicly announce the use of old data sets. However, foremost researchers will need to treat the data respectfully. It remains vital that professionals and the society continue to elaborate on the norms and values that shape the common understanding of what is morally right and wrong when researching data.
- informed consent
- research ethics
- autonomy
Data availability statement
There are no data in this work.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Children in health research: a matter of trust
- Control, trust and the sharing of health information: the limits of trust
- The biobank consent debate: Why ‘meta-consent’ is not the solution?
- Public preferences towards data management and governance in Swiss biobanks: results from a nationwide survey
- Building on relationships of trust in biobank research
- Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust
- Accessing medical biobanks to solve crimes: ethical considerations
- Broadening consent—and diluting ethics?
- Patients’ refusal to consent to storage and use of samples in Swedish biobanks: cross sectional study
- Lost property? Legal compensation for destroyed sperm: a reflection and comparison drawing on UK and French perspectives