Article Text
Abstract
In this paper, we respond to Andrew Avins's recent review of methods whose use he advocates in clinical trials, to make them more ethical. He recommends in particular, “unbalanced randomisation”. However, we argue that, before such a recommendation can be made, it is important to establish why unequal randomisation might offer ethical advantages over equal randomisation, other things being equal. It is important to make a pragmatic distinction between trials of treatments that are already routinely available and trials of restricted treatments. We conclude that unequal randomisation could, indeed, be an ethical compromise between protecting the interests of participants and those of society.
- RCTs
- human experimentation
- ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Sarah J L Edwards, Bsc, MA, lectures in Medical Ethics at the Centre for Bioscience and Ethics, Department of Primary Care and General Practice, The University of Birmingham. David A Braunholtz, BA, is a Senior Research Fellow, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, The University of Birmingham.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Rationing, randomising, and researching in health care provision
- Use of unequal randomisation to aid the economic efficiency of clinical trials
- Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk
- Learning health systems, clinical equipoise and the ethics of response adaptive randomisation
- What matters most to patients when choosing treatment for mild–moderate asthma? Results from a discrete choice experiment
- Should desperate volunteers be included in randomised controlled trials?
- Participants’ perceptions of motivation, randomisation and withdrawal in a randomised controlled trial of interventions for prevention of depression
- Exploring patients’ perceptions and experiences of treatments for the prevention of variceal bleeding: a qualitative study
- Healthcare professionals’ views of the use and administration of two salvage therapy drugs for acute ulcerative colitis: a nested qualitative study within the CONSTRUCT trial
- Are ethical principles relative to time and place? A Star Wars perspective on the Alder Hey affair