Article info
Debate
Can unequal be more fair? A response to Andrew Avins
Citation
Can unequal be more fair? A response to Andrew Avins
Publication history
- First published June 1, 2000.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2000 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Rationing, randomising, and researching in health care provision
- Use of unequal randomisation to aid the economic efficiency of clinical trials
- Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk
- Learning health systems, clinical equipoise and the ethics of response adaptive randomisation
- What matters most to patients when choosing treatment for mild–moderate asthma? Results from a discrete choice experiment
- Should desperate volunteers be included in randomised controlled trials?
- Participants’ perceptions of motivation, randomisation and withdrawal in a randomised controlled trial of interventions for prevention of depression
- Exploring patients’ perceptions and experiences of treatments for the prevention of variceal bleeding: a qualitative study
- Healthcare professionals’ views of the use and administration of two salvage therapy drugs for acute ulcerative colitis: a nested qualitative study within the CONSTRUCT trial
- Are ethical principles relative to time and place? A Star Wars perspective on the Alder Hey affair