Citation Tools
PDFOriginal Article
Consensus and contention regarding redundant publications in clinical research: cross-sectional survey of editors and authors
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Consensus and contention regarding redundant publications in clinical research: cross-sectional survey of editors and authors
Other content recommended for you
- Lessons from a case of overlapping publications
- Improving biomedical journals’ ethical policies: the case of research misconduct
- Sixth version of the “Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals”: lots of ethics, some new recommendations for manuscript preparation
- Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey
- Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008
- Plagiarism in research: a survey of African medical journals
- Research misconduct and redundant publication
- Awareness, usage and perceptions of authorship guidelines: an international survey of biomedical authors
- Duplicate publication, redundant publication, and disclosure of closely related publications
- Good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research: the GPP2 guidelines