Article info
PDFLetter
Response to: increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it
Citation
Response to: increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it
Publication history
- First published December 8, 2003.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2003 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Honouring patient's resuscitation wishes: a multiphased effort to improve identification and documentation
- Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?
- Variation in the design of Do Not Resuscitate orders and other code status options: a multi-institutional qualitative study
- Effect of do-not-resuscitate orders on patients with sepsis in the medical intensive care unit: a retrospective, observational and propensity score-matched study in a tertiary referral hospital in Taiwan
- Evaluation of end of life care in cancer patients at a teaching hospital in Japan
- Scale of levels of care versus DNR orders
- “Do-not-resuscitate” orders in patients with cancer at a children’s hospital in Taiwan
- Are do-not-resuscitate orders associated with limitations of care beyond their intended purpose in patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage? Analysis of the ABC-ICH study
- Should patient consent be required to write a do not resuscitate order?
- Deconstructing DNR