Article info
PDFSymposium on circumcision
Value judgment, harm, and religious liberty
- Correspondence to: A M Viens Department of Philosophy, St Anne’s College, Oxford University, Oxford, UK; adrian.viensphilosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Value judgment, harm, and religious liberty
Publication history
- First published June 1, 2004.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2004 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Claimed by culture: circumcision, cochlear implants and the ‘intact’ body
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision
- Female genital alteration: a compromise solution
- Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation
- Circumcision: What should be done?
- The development of professional guidelines on the law and ethics of male circumcision
- Rationalising circumcision: from tradition to fashion, from public health to individual freedom—critical notes on cultural persistence of the practice of genital mutilation