Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Parental preferences for neonatal resuscitation research consent: a pilot study
- Correspondence to: Dr D J Davis Center for Clinical Education, Teilum, Afsnit 5404, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark; deborah.davis{at}rh.hosp.dk
Citation
Parental preferences for neonatal resuscitation research consent: a pilot study
Publication history
- Received November 17, 2004
- Accepted April 4, 2005
- Revised March 31, 2005
- First published November 30, 2005.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2005 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Observational study of parental opinion of deferred consent for neonatal research
- Infants in a neonatal intensive care unit: parental response
- Differences in demographics and outcomes based on method of consent for a randomised controlled trial on heat loss prevention in the delivery room
- 2022 Eastern Regional Meeting
- Parental opinion of consent in neonatal research
- Deferred consent for the enrolment of neonates in delivery room studies: strengthening the approach
- Parental consent and neonatal delivery room trials: walking an ethical tightrope
- Parental stress, depression, anxiety and participation in care in neonatal intensive care unit: a cross-sectional study in Italy comparing mothers versus fathers
- Pilot study to establish a prospective neonatal cohort: Study of Preterm Infants and Neurodevelopmental Genes (SPRING)
- Peer-to-peer support in the neonatal intensive care unit may improve parents’ experiences with their hospitalised infant