Article info
PDFEthics
Is genetic information relevantly different from other kinds of non-genetic information in the life insurance context?
- Ms P J Malpas, Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, NZ; p.malpas{at}auckland.ac.nz
Citation
Is genetic information relevantly different from other kinds of non-genetic information in the life insurance context?
Publication history
- Received September 22, 2007
- Revised November 12, 2007
- Accepted November 16, 2007
- First published June 30, 2008.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- A step forward, but still inadequate: Australian health professionals’ views on the genetics and life insurance moratorium
- Genetic information, insurance and a pluralistic approach to justice
- Genetic information, discrimination, philosophical pluralism and politics
- The routinisation of genomics and genetics: implications for ethical practices
- The new genetics: Genetic testing and public policy
- Genetic discrimination in life insurance: empirical evidence from a cross sectional survey of genetic support groups in the United Kingdom
- 53 GENETIC DISCRIMINATION BY INSURERS AS A RESULT OF GENETIC RESEARCH AND TESTING: A COMPARISON OF NATIONAL POLICIES
- Genetic discrimination in life insurance: a human rights issue
- Perceptions of genetic discrimination among people at risk for Huntington’s disease: a cross sectional survey
- An evaluation of needs of female BRCA1and BRCA2 carriers undergoing genetic counselling