Article info
PDFResearch ethics
A comparison of journal instructions regarding institutional review board approval and conflict-of-interest disclosure between 1995 and 2005
- Dr Anne Rowan-Legg, Department of Pediatrics, IWK Health Centre, 5850 University Avenue, PO Box 9700, Halifax, Canada, B3K 6R8; arowanle{at}dal.ca
Citation
A comparison of journal instructions regarding institutional review board approval and conflict-of-interest disclosure between 1995 and 2005
Publication history
- Received January 9, 2008
- Revised May 12, 2008
- Accepted May 23, 2008
- First published December 22, 2008.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2009 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Reporting of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest by authors of systematic reviews: a methodological survey
- Internet-based crowdsourcing and research ethics: the case for IRB review
- Evaluating the impact and use of Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomised Designs (TREND) reporting guidelines
- Conflict of interest policies and disclosure requirements among European Society of Cardiology national cardiovascular journals
- Clinical Research From Proposal to Implementation
- Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts on age-related macular degeneration health care: a cross-sectional quantification of the adherence to CONSORT abstract reporting recommendations
- Using the CONSORT statement to evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised trials: a cross-sectional review
- Poor adherence of randomised trials in surgery to CONSORT guidelines for non-pharmacological treatments (NPT): a cross-sectional study
- CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
- Adherence to reporting guidelines and clinical trial registration policies in oncology journals: a cross-sectional review