Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Paper
Why participating in (certain) scientific research is a moral duty
- Correspondence to Joanna Stjernschantz Forsberg, Uppsala University—Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Box 564, Uppsala 75122, Sweden; joanna.forsberg{at}crb.uu.se
Citation
Why participating in (certain) scientific research is a moral duty
Publication history
- Received June 12, 2012
- Revised December 18, 2012
- Accepted January 11, 2013
- First published January 31, 2013.
Online issue publication
February 28, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- The 2008 Declaration of Helsinki: some reflections
- Towards a national genomics medicine service: the challenges facing clinical-research hybrid practices and the case of the 100 000 genomes project
- Scientific research is a moral duty
- Participation in biomedical research is an imperfect moral duty: a response to John Harris
- ‘Healthcare Heroes’: problems with media focus on heroism from healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
- Payment for participation in research: a pursuit for the poor?
- Ethics and governance of global health inequalities
- Should patients be allowed to veto their participation in clinical research?
- Biobank research: who benefits from individual consent?
- An investigation of patients’ motivations for their participation in genetics-related research