Citation Tools
PDFOriginal research
Revising ethical guidance for the evaluation of programmes and interventions not initiated by researchers
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Revising ethical guidance for the evaluation of programmes and interventions not initiated by researchers
Other content recommended for you
- Community-based interventions for detection and management of diabetes and hypertension in underserved communities: a mixed-methods evaluation in Brazil, India, South Africa and the USA
- Proactive community case management and child survival: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
- A household-based community health worker programme for non-communicable disease, malnutrition, tuberculosis, HIV and maternal health: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial in Neno District, Malawi
- Evaluating process and clinical outcomes of a primary care mental health integration project in rural Rwanda: a prospective mixed-methods protocol
- Effect of a home-based health, nutrition and responsive stimulation intervention and conditional cash transfers on child development and growth: a cluster-randomised controlled trial in Tanzania
- Evaluating the impact of a community health worker programme on non-communicable disease, malnutrition, tuberculosis, family planning and antenatal care in Neno, Malawi: protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster randomised controlled trial
- The role of governance in implementing sustainable global health interventions: review of health system integration for integrated community case management (iCCM) of childhood illnesses
- Ottawa Statement does not impede randomised evaluation of government health programmes
- Evaluation of NEWS2 response thresholds in a retrospective observational study from a UK acute hospital
- Observational stepped-wedge analysis of a community health worker-led intervention for diabetes and hypertension in rural Mexico