Article info
PDFOriginal research
Training clinical ethics committee members between 1992 and 2017: systematic scoping review
- Correspondence to Ms Yun Ting Ong, Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore; yunting.ong08{at}gmail.com
Citation
Training clinical ethics committee members between 1992 and 2017: systematic scoping review
Publication history
- Received July 3, 2019
- Revised August 20, 2019
- Accepted August 25, 2019
- First published September 16, 2019.
Online issue publication
January 14, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (14 January 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Consultation activities of clinical ethics committees in the United Kingdom: an empirical study and wake-up call
- Evaluating a clinical ethics committee (CEC) implementation process in an oncological research hospital: protocol for a process evaluation study using normalisation process theory (EvaCEC)
- Ethical advice in paediatric care
- Evolution of hospital clinical ethics committees in Canada
- Legal aspects of clinical ethics committees
- Importance of systematic deliberation and stakeholder presence: a national study of clinical ethics committees
- The unpalatable truth about ethics committees
- Evidence-guided approach to portfolio-guided teaching and assessing communications, ethics and professionalism for medical students and physicians: a systematic scoping review
- What is the role of clinical ethics support in the era of e-medicine?
- Development of clinical ethics services in the UK: a national survey