Article Text
Abstract
Although there is wide agreement that ethics consults are at risk for conflicts of interest (COIs), ethics consultants (ECs) have limited guidance with regard to how to identify and approach COIs. We aim to address these concerns and provide practical guidance. We will define and consider four categories of COIs: consult type, team composition, dual clinical roles and other concerns. We will define and consider six actions available for ECs to take in response to COIs: no action, disclosure only, obtaining a second opinion, referring to another EC, referring to an institutional ethics committee or seeking an outside consult. We will then propose a points-based algorithm for ECs to use to determine the appropriate response to COI. Finally, we will discuss the strengths and limitations of our proposed algorithm.
- ethics committees/consultation
- clinical ethics
Data availability statement
There are no data in this work.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
There are no data in this work.
Footnotes
Twitter @laurabwebster
Contributors This project was initially conceptualised by EMW, AW and DD. LW helped develop the framework. EMW drafted the initial manuscript. All authors verify the final version as submitted.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Conflict of interest policies and disclosure requirements among European Society of Cardiology national cardiovascular journals
- Mandatory disclosure of financial interests of journals and editors
- Conflict-of-interest disclosure at medical journals in Japan: a nationwide survey of the practices of journal secretariats
- Effect of revealing authors’ conflicts of interests in peer review: randomized controlled trial
- Conflicts of interest and spin in reviews of psychological therapies: a systematic review
- Discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review
- Ten years later: a review of the US 2009 institute of medicine report on conflicts of interest and solutions for further reform
- Reporting of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest by authors of systematic reviews: a methodological survey
- A report on small team clinical ethics consultation programmes in Japan
- Accessibility and transparency of editor conflicts of interest policy instruments in medical journals