Article info
PDFExtended essay
‘The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back’: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews
- Correspondence to Dr Anna Mae Scott, Institute for Evidence Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD 4226, Australia; ascott{at}bond.edu.au
Citation
‘The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back’: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews
Publication history
- Received August 11, 2020
- Revised November 3, 2020
- Accepted November 10, 2020
- First published January 11, 2021.
Online issue publication
January 07, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (7 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions
- Health policy and systems research: towards a better understanding and review of ethical issues
- Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries
- Lay REC members: patient or public?
- The experiences of ethics committee members: contradictions between individuals and committees
- Does setting good practice standards for research ethics committees increase their legal liability?
- Determining the need for ethical review: a three-stage Delphi study
- Navigating the maze: ethics approval pathways for intellectual disability research
- Ethics review of research: in pursuit of proportionality